We Was Robbed – FIFA clash with the Ambush Marketers
Attack and Counterattack
Recent news stories have highlighted the lengths FIFA are prepared to go to in protecting its brand.
Last Monday’s Holland v Denmark game saw 36 female supporters wearing orange mini dresses participating in an ambush marketing stunt for the Dutch beer brand Bavaria.
Ambush marketing, the practice of finding a way to promote a brand at a high profile event without paying a sponsorship, has long been a marketing strategy of Bavaria. At the 2006 world cup in Germany, 1000 fans wearing branded underwear were denied entry to a Holland game, and more recently it has been targeting the Dutch national team matches.
FIFA has promised to come down hard on any brand trying to highjack the tournament and this was the case last Monday. The group of women were ejected from the stadium and two of the 36 were later arrested. In addition to this, the ITV pundit Robbie Earl has been sacked by ITV as it has emerged that some of the tickets used by Bavaria were from the ex-Jamaica and Wimbledon midfielder’s allocation; which he was prohibited from redistributing to third parties.
Logo or No Logo
With the world cup now in full swing, businesses around the country have included references to the event in their advertising and promotional activity in a bid to cash in on its popularity. Some of those are official sponsors, who have paid millions to be able to do so; however, a considerably large number of businesses haven’t paid for the privilege. They simply seek to associate their business with the pride and passion that the tournament evokes, with the ultimate aim of increasing sales. However it does come with some risks attached.
Many business may not be aware of the extent to which FIFA have rights over and above ordinary trademark or copyright protection in South Africa. FIFA has every motivation to stamp out such practices, which threaten the sponsorship revenues from their official partners. It already has trademark protection over a number of words, like ‘2010 FIFA World Cup’ and images, such as its official emblem for the tournament. The host country has gone so far to keep FIFA and its sponsors happy, it has created a new list of prohibited marks under special legislation, even including the use of ‘2010’ on its own, which is not a trademark.
For businesses operating in the UK, the situation is rather less draconian. However, there are reports that FIFA has obtained a ruling against a sports bar near the Loftus stadium using phrases such as ‘World Cup 2010’.
Things to Remember…
The most important guidance is to always avoid the using of any FIFA artwork or branding – such as its logo or the ‘man kicking ball’ official 2010 world cup emblem. For more information and guidance about when you can cannot use World Cup related terms, FIFA has provided a Public Information Sheet which states what is acceptable and the terms of use.
Use of the term ‘World Cup’ or similar phrases is less likely to be an issue, although each situation is different, so it is important to take legal advice in order to avoid prosecution.
Posted by SA Law at 5:21 pm on June 21, 2010.
Categories:
Intellectual Property, Nathanael Young, Sport

Author: